Eddie Harrison
film-authority.com
Sep 2, 2026
2/5
…Superman III is crass, corny, and a permanent strain to watch…Richard Pryor’s brand of worldly comedy just doesn’t fit this universe and the result is a tonal catastrophe that shows director Richard Lester way out of his comic element….
Go to Full Review
Richard Freedman
Newark Star-Ledger
Jan 12, 2026
The "Superman" saga seems to be running out of fresh ideas, smack into premature middle age.
Go to Full Review
Brad Cook
Flickering Myth
Jul 10, 2025
2/5
Lester apparently encouraged Pryor to do a lot of the shtick he was famous for at the time, which made the movie more campy than it should have been.
Go to Full Review
David Denby
New York Magazine/Vulture
Jul 8, 2025
Tedious, labored, and feeble beyond belief.
Go to Full Review
Michael D. Reid
Victoria Times Colonist (B.C., Canada)
Jul 8, 2025
Attempting to endow Superman with human weakness drains the inherent magic.
Go to Full Review
David Wilson
Tulsa World
Jul 8, 2025
It's neither bird nor plane, nor super sequel. It's Superman III, and it flies the lowest of three films featuring the strong-but sensitive stud.
Go to Full Review
Tom Sabulis
Tampa Bay Times
Jul 8, 2025
3/5
Ultimately, Superman III is not bad considering the other action packed drivel coming out of Hollywood.
Go to Full Review
Anna Maria Dell'oso
Sydney Morning Herald
Jul 8, 2025
A witty refreshing escape of a movie.
Go to Full Review
Harper Barnes
St. Louis Post-Dispatch
Jul 8, 2025
Mainly, it is pretty much what you would expect from a Superman movie starring Richard Pryor: moderately entertaining and totally predictable.
Go to Full Review
Bruce R. Miller
Sioux City Journal
Jul 8, 2025
Obviously, III was made to make money. It's just too bad its ulterior motive couldn't have been fun.
Go to Full Review
John Stark
San Francisco Examiner
Jul 8, 2025
Lester fails to keep that spark going, despite the charismatic presence of Richard Pryor.
Go to Full Review
George Williams
Sacramento Bee
Jul 8, 2025
It has a disjointed script that manages to transform the Man of Steel into a first-class dope. And it misuses a strong performer like Richard Pryor in a way that any 12-year-old movie fan could have predicted would leave an audience cold.
Go to Full Review
Jack Garner
Rochester Democrat and Chronicle
Jul 8, 2025
Superman III fails to balance three separate, and not always well articulated stories.
Go to Full Review
George Anderson
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Jul 8, 2025
The new movie pushes the comedy so hard the heroine is lost.
Go to Full Review
Desmond Ryan
Philadelphia Inquirer
Jul 8, 2025
Superman III has a pleasing, down to earth quality, and Pryor serves as the bridge to the fantasy elements.
Go to Full Review
Joe Baltake
Philadelphia Daily News
Jul 8, 2025
It shouldn't work. But it manages to get by because of a couple of guys named Richard and the pure pleasure syndrome that each one brings to the production.
Go to Full Review
Noel Taylor
Ottawa Citizen
Jul 8, 2025
Even with Pryors help, it's clear by now the Superman mystique has worked itself out.
Go to Full Review
Jay Boyar
Orlando Sentinel
Jul 8, 2025
4/5
The results are as surprising and charming as a vacation in the bottled city of Kandor.
Go to Full Review
Bob Hicks
Oregonian
Jul 8, 2025
This is a comic book movie, and it feels just like a comic book -- visually, verbally, in its flat but flighty caricatures and the crazily out of whack inventiveness of its story line.
Go to Full Review
Joseph Gelmis
Newsday
Jul 8, 2025
2.5/4
The movie works best as slapstick comedy.
Go to Full Review