Ray Pride Newcity Jul 2, 2024 7/10

What works is the microscopic momentousness: catching instants of betrayal, rage, passion, the etching of lies. Momentousness and moment: I like the brute-simple text as well. It’s a curious collage, if not the protean adventure Figgis is touting.

Go to Full Review

Emanuel Levy EmanuelLevy.Com Jan 17, 2013 B-

Go to Full Review

John A. Nesbit Old School Reviews Jul 2, 2012 C+

a fascinating introduction to innovative film technique

Go to Full Review

Jim Lane Sacramento News & Review Aug 7, 2008 3/5

Go to Full Review

Keith H. Brown Eye for Film Dec 17, 2007 2.5/5

Go to Full Review

Joe Lozito Big Picture Big Sound Jul 14, 2007 3.5/4

Go to Full Review

Frank Swietek One Guy's Opinion Jul 24, 2006 C+

Go to Full Review

Susan Tavernetti Palo Alto Weekly May 20, 2003 3/4

Go to Full Review

Sarah Hall ViewLondon Oct 30, 2002 3/5

Go to Full Review

Jeremy Heilman MovieMartyr.com Mar 5, 2002 3.5/4

Go to Full Review

Michael W. Phillips, Jr. Goatdog's Movies Feb 28, 2002 3/5

The film's raison d'etre is its technique.

Go to Full Review

Chuck Rudolph Matinee Magazine Feb 21, 2002 short

What fails it is the generic, banal storyline.

Go to Full Review

Chris Kaynes Apollo Guide Jul 24, 2001 82/100

Go to Full Review

Nick Davis Nick's Flick Picks Apr 28, 2000 B

Go to Full Review

Rene Rodriguez Miami Herald Jan 1, 2000

The story is not the thing in Time Code. It's the way in which it is told that makes this one so intriguing.

Go to Full Review

Amy Taubin Village Voice Jan 1, 2000

Everything Figgis tries to do in Time Code, Warhol did three decades ago.

Go to Full Review

Jeff Vice Deseret News (Salt Lake City) Jan 1, 2000

There's a lot to see in Timecode. Unfortunately, there's not a lot that's interesting.

Go to Full Review

Roger Ebert Chicago Sun-Times Jan 1, 2000 3/4

I recommend the film.

Go to Full Review

James Berardinelli ReelViews Jan 1, 2000 2/4

A triumph of style and technological innovation, but a failure in terms of storytelling.

Go to Full Review

Kevin Thomas Los Angeles Times Jan 1, 2000 4/5

The screen is filled by 28 actors, some familiar and some not, but all of them effective.

Go to Full Review