Rotten Tomatoes
Suggestions will appear as you start typing. Submit search Movies Tv shows RT App New News Showtimes

Freaks

Play trailer Poster for Freaks 1932,  1h 4m,  Horror Play Trailer Watchlist
Watchlist 95% 55 Reviews Tomatometer 88% 10,000+ Ratings Popcornmeter
95% Tomatometer 55 Reviews 88% Popcornmeter 10,000+ Ratings
When trapeze artist Cleopatra (Olga Baclanova) learns that circus midget Hans (Harry Earles) has an inheritance, she marries the lovesick, diminutive performer, all the while planning to steal his fortune and run off with her lover, strong man Hercules (Henry Victor). When Hans' friends and fellow performers discover what is going on, they band together and carry out a brutal revenge that leaves Hercules and Cleopatra knowing what it truly means to be a freak.
Freaks

What to Know

Critics Consensus

Time has been kind to this horror legend: Freaks manages to frighten, shock, and even touch viewers in ways that contemporary viewers missed.

Read Critics Reviews

Critics Reviews

View More
Joe Morgenstern Wall Street Journal Sep 28, 2015
[Boasts] some of the most terrifying scenes ever consigned to film. Go to Full Review
Mark Kermode Observer (UK) Jun 14, 2015
4/5
Browning's sympathies are clear; if there are "freaks" on display here, they are not the versatile performers to whom the title seems to allude. Go to Full Review
Tom Huddleston Time Out Jun 8, 2015
5/5
One of the most powerful films ever made about the need for humanity and solidarity in the face of cruelty and oppression. Go to Full Review
David Nusair Reel Film Reviews Nov 7, 2025
3/4
...an erratic endeavor that grows more and more compelling (and involving) as it unfolds... Go to Full Review
Michael Nordine Film Occasionally Oct 24, 2023
That such a daring, transgressive film was made by a major studio in the early ‘30s remains a marvel (thanks, Irving Thalberg); that it irreparably harmed the career of its director is disheartening if not surprising. Go to Full Review
Douglas Davidson Elements of Madness Oct 17, 2023
Each one, by nature of the period in which they were released and how audiences responded to them, have a legacy that must be explored, mulled over, and come to terms with if cinema is going to tell honest stories without exploitation. Go to Full Review
Read all reviews

Audience Reviews

View More
Draco R Sep 21, 2018 It's a movie that they would never let be made today due to exploitation "rules", which makes it even more special. It may not be everyones cup of tea. I found it to be very interesting and entertaining. There are definitely some creepy scenes that give you goosebumps. The plot is different and entertaining. See more
Finn M Jul 18, 2018 A classic of pre-Code cinema, Tod Browning's 'Freaks' is populated with a broad cast of real-life carnival performers and those with deformities, and the effect is striking. We see the armless, legless, and completely limbless. We see conjoined twins, a 'human skeleton', and microcephalics (so-called 'pinheads'). We see a 'bird girl' and a 'stork woman' (who we find out later had Virchow-Seckel syndrome). And we see some of the more conventional carnival acts: a bearded lady, a half-man/half-woman, a fire-eater, and a sword-swallower. We never see them performing in front of an audience; instead all of the action in the film is behind the scenes, and the effect is humanizing. We see life from their perspective, and that they face the same relationship issues that the rest of society face. We watch the film perhaps voyeuristically because of the deformities and differences, but it's to Browning's credit that they are shown sympathetically. A caretaker for a group which includes the three microcephalics chides a couple of guys who react in horror, pointing out they're just children who are playing in the sun. A little person (Harry Earles) points out that most 'big people' laugh at him, because "they don't realize that I'm a man with the same feelings they have." It's telling that the real 'freaks' in the story are two "normal people", a trapeze artist (Olga Baclanova) and her strong-man boyfriend (Henry Victor), who play on Earles' emotions, and then plot to kill him for his money. There are several truly memorable scenes, starting with Prince Randian, "The Human Torso", an armless and legless performer in a tight one-piece garment making him appear like a caterpillar, manipulating a cigarette and a matchbox with ease, and fluidly giving himself a light. Another is when the performers are all drinking at a wedding and chanting "One of us, one of us, Gooble gobble, Gooble gobble, We accept her, we accept her, One of us, one of us" riotously, until Baclanova erupts in disgust and calls them all freaks. The look of hurt in their eyes, and shame in Earles' face is heart-rending. However, nothing can top the circus performers crawling through the mud, with revenge in their eyes. The extended sequence that this led to was so disturbing that the film's 90 minute run-time had to get cut down to just 64, and it's a real shame that the original is lost. Great film, from a great director. See more
George G Mar 31, 2018 WHY THE HELL does everyone think this movie is so great? I hated it, i thought that it was so long and annoying!
Anakin S Feb 17, 2018 Hmmm...this is a tough one to talk about on a critical level. 1932's "Freaks" is an oddball short film (1 hour long!), but not for its obvious use of circus performers and deformity as a message, but for how it structures itself in telling its short story. A story that, to be honest, does not warrant one to see it again and again. I'm also left confused with what it was trying to say because of its odd approach to story telling. I'm glad to have seen this curious piece of film history, but I don't think it will appeal to many who aren't film buffs. See more
Jan 10, 2018 Would have liked to see the full version. As for the "Freaks" - they're not scary at all. I imagine back in those days it was as they never saw a disabled person before but nowadays we see much more revolting pictures e.g. of rare diseases with a simple google search. Still, the story was good imo. See more
Albus W Dec 6, 2017 Rightfully considered as standing alone in a subgenre of one, Freaks has well-balanced characters, an engaging atmosphere, and a controversial yet important message, that still holds up. Historically condemned and met with lackluster contemporary reception, Freaks is now considered culturally and aesthetically important - for several reasons, ranging from the daring vision of its director, to the unsettling plot, making the viewer confront his/her own stereotypes. Overall 7/10 Full review here: https://movie-discourse.blogspot.de/2017/11/freaks-usa-1932.html See more
Read all reviews
Freaks

My Rating

Read More Read Less WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW POST RATING
Nosferatu 97% 87% Nosferatu Watchlist Haxan 93% 81% Haxan Watchlist The Vanishing 96% 88% The Vanishing Watchlist Grisbi 100% 86% Grisbi Watchlist The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari 96% 89% The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari Watchlist Discover more movies and TV shows. View More

Movie Info

Synopsis When trapeze artist Cleopatra (Olga Baclanova) learns that circus midget Hans (Harry Earles) has an inheritance, she marries the lovesick, diminutive performer, all the while planning to steal his fortune and run off with her lover, strong man Hercules (Henry Victor). When Hans' friends and fellow performers discover what is going on, they band together and carry out a brutal revenge that leaves Hercules and Cleopatra knowing what it truly means to be a freak.
Director
Tod Browning
Producer
Tod Browning, Dwain Esper, Hildegarde Stadie, Irving Thalberg
Screenwriter
Al Boasberg, Willis Goldbeck, Leon Gordon, Edgar Allan Woolf
Distributor
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer
Production Co
Metro Goldwyn Mayer
Genre
Horror
Original Language
English
Release Date (Theaters)
Feb 20, 1932, Original
Release Date (Streaming)
Oct 18, 2010
Runtime
1h 4m
Sound Mix
Stereo, Mono
Aspect Ratio
35mm, Flat (1.37:1)
Join The Newsletter Join The Newsletter Cookie Settings